Showing posts with label Opioid class. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opioid class. Show all posts

24 April 2014

Oxymorphone (Numorphan)

Pronunciation: ox-i-MOR-fohn
Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number: 76-41-5. (Hydrochloride form 357-07-3)
Formal Names: Numorphan
Type: Depressant (opioid class).
Federal Schedule Listing: Schedule II (DEA no. 9652)
USA Availability: Prescription
Pregnancy Category: C

Uses.
Medically this drug is used to ease pain and assist in anesthesia. It is about 9 to 13 times stronger than morphine, with similar actions. Oxymorphone has been likened to heroin. Because body chemistry transforms part of an oxycodone dose into oxymorphone, scientists wondered if oxycodone’s therapeutic actions actually came from oxymorphone; upon investigation, experimenters concluded that oxycodone does produce effects apart from those of oxymorphone. Allowing hospitalized patients to control their own oxymorphone dosage for pain relief has caused no problems. Hydromorphone can sometimes be used as a substitute. A case report indicates oxymorphone can have antidepressant actions.

Drawbacks.
Unwanted effects of oxymorphone can include nausea, vomiting, and breathing difficulty. Euphoria has been noted in horses that receive the drug.

Abuse factors.
Not enough scientific information to report, but the drug is legally classified as highly addictive.
Drug interactions. Other depressants should generally be avoided, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs, found in some antidepressants and other medicine) should also be avoided.

Cancer.
Not enough scientific information to report.

Pregnancy. Birth defects appeared after experimenters gave pregnant hamsters 1,500 times the recommended human dose. Effects on human pregnancy are unknown. The drug can influence fetal heartbeat if used in childbirth.

Oxymorphone has been found effective for easing pain after caesarean section.

Additional scientific information may be found in:
Heiskanen, T.E., et al. “Morphine or Oxycodone in Cancer Pain?” Acta Oncologica
(Stockholm, Sweden) 39 (2000): 941–47.

Johnstone, R.E., et al. “Combination of Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol with Oxymorphone
or Pentobarbital: Effects on Ventilatory Control and Cardiovascular Dynamics.”
Anesthesiology 42 (1975): 674–84.

Sinatra, R.S., and D.M. Harrison. “Oxymorphone in Patient-Controlled Analgesia.”
Clinical Pharmacy 8 (1989): 541, 544.

Sinatra, R.S., et al. “A Comparison of Morphine, Meperidine, and Oxymorphone as
Utilized in Patient-Controlled Analgesia Following Cesarean Delivery.” Anesthesiology
70 (1989): 585–90.

Stoll, A.L., and S. Rueter. “Treatment Augmentation with Opiates in Severe and Refractory
Major Depression.” American Journal of Psychiatry 156 (1999): 2017.

11 March 2009

PHARMACOLOGICAL AND OPIOID RECEPTORS

It has been recognized for more than a century that the neurotransmitters of the nervous system produce their biological effects through interaction at specific drug binding sites or receptors. These receptors, many of which have been isolated and characterized in the past two decades, are typically specialized proteins on the cell surface. The function of these proteins is to recognize the neurotransmitter and to enable the molecule to bind to the receptor to trigger a biological response— muscle contraction, hormone or neurotransmitter secretion, or increased cardiac rate, for example. These interactions are typically quite specific and are often viewed in terms of a “lock and key”model. Despite this specificity it is usually found that a number of chemical variations around a particular structure can also be accommodated at the receptor site.

When these chemical variants can also trigger the biological response they
are termed “agonists.” However, some molecules can bind to the receptor and not trigger the response, but rather block the response: these drugs are termed “antagonists.”Thus, for example, the naturally occurring atropine from the Belladonna plant can block the actions of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the parasympathetic system by interacting with the same receptors that acetylcholine uses.

The alkaloids in opium, including morphine, also interact with specific receptors (opiate receptors) within the central and peripheral nervous systems. At these receptors, the alkaloids in opium mimic the effects of the body’s natural opiates.

There are actually three major structural classes of opiates that occur in the body: enkephalins, endorphins, and dynorphins. The existence of these endogenous molecules was initially theorized because morphine and related drugs had been shown to exert their pharmacological and therapeutic effects through interaction at specific receptors.Due to the specific locations of these interactions, scientists postulated that there must exist corresponding endogenous physiologically employed molecules. A similar argument was employed in the search for the endogenous equivalent of the cannabinoids found in marijuana and led to the recognition of the so-called “endocannabinoid” system.

There are three principal classes of opiate receptors, designated m, k, and d, and there exist a number of drugs that are specific for each of these receptor types. However, most of the clinically used opiates are quite selective for the mÙreceptor: the endogenous opiates enkephalin, endorphin and dynorphin are selective for the mÙand d, d and k receptors respectively.When activated by opioids these receptors produce biochemical signals that block neurotransmitter release from nerve terminals, a process that underlies their blockade of pain signaling pathways as well as other effects, such as constipation, diuresis, euphoria, and feeding.

Brief administration of opioids leads to the development of acute tolerance, whereby increased quantities of the opioid are required to produce the same end result, but this process is rapidly reversed once the administration is ceased.

However, more prolonged administration leads to classical or chronic tolerance from which state recovery to full sensitivity make take several days. These phenomena are not unique to opioid drugs, but rather are common to virtually all drug-receptor interactions and appear to be a common property of pharmacological receptors. Tolerance may also be associated with the state of physical dependence. The chronic administration of a drug, in this context an opioid, may result in a resetting of homeostatic mechanisms, and maintenance of this new state requires continued drug administration. Cessation of drug administration can then result in the phenomenon of withdrawal, during which the nervous system is excessively perturbed as it readapts to its original drug-free state. It should be emphasized that tolerance and physical dependence are physiological responses to continued administration of opioids and are not, contrary to some popular opinion, predictors of addiction. For example, patients with severe pain from bone cancer require very large amounts of opioids, yet these patients do not become addicted and will not even show withdrawal if the drug doses are reduced slowly over a period of days. Unfortunately, misinformation about opioids has led to patients with severe pain being undertreated.